Modern Scientists Fail to take into account new findings. They believe they have already figured out the contents of the Earth and don't need to be bothered with any information that contradicts that. In example: the Kola superdeep borehole drilled into the Earth by Russia, in the Kola peninsula in Siberia. It stands as the deepest man-made hole ever dug into the earth at that latitude into sedimentary rock. Latitude and the type of rock matters. The earth's crust is thicker at the equator and thinner at the poles. And the crust is thicker in volcanic regions than sedimentary regions (due to the walls of the volcano's shaft), continents may also be thinner at their edges!
So what are scientists wrong about? they told us all that the Earth's crust was 20 miles deep to account for all the layers that would be necessary for the earth to be 5 billion years old at a rate of 1 layer per year. They said after the Crust the Mantle suddenly starts and it's a giant magma filled cavern that the continents float on and where diamonds are made. then you have the outer core and the inner core which are of varying densities of liquide metal. And thats it, end of story. Even after the Kola superdeep borehole's findings, they never thought that they needed to change anything. they didn't even think about it, the science books kids are graded on still tell the same tale and no one wants to change that.
So whats wrong with it? at the Kola peninsula, the borehole drilled down a little more than 2.7 miles only to have to cease drilling operations because the drill cut through Layers of New Rock until the new rock became soft, so soft that the drill was cutting into mud. When they dragged the drill shaft back up 2.7 miles and cleaned it off then sent it back down, they found that the hole had been somewhat filled in with the mud. It became impossible to drill any further. but it wasn't just mud they found, it was hot mud, not magma or lava, but a hundred degrees or so hot mud, not only that it became thinner and thinner until they struck water. Thats right you read that right, they struck a lake of fresh water 2.7 miles deep in the earth. Highly pressureized hot water rich in minerals and living Bacteria.
If you can't tell what implications that has on the formation of the Earth, then you need a new brain. It changes everything in the text book graded explanation of the Earth's layers and thus it's formation. Oh and by the way, no one has ever drilled 20 miles deep anywhere.
What this means is that the Earth's Crust is about 2.7 miles thick (a little over 10% of the projected thickness) floating on top of highly pressurized inner earth lakes and oceans (more were found, they added all the water together and stated that if it were all on the surface it'd make a layer of water so thick it'd be more than 39,000 feet high globally, taller than mount everest. Ah.. so theres the water from the flood of Noah... Right where the bible said God put it when he split the world open and forced it in and then shut it) Then after the oceans you have the Mantle a layer of liquid magma which as it interacts with these inner earth oceans explodes and spits sediments up into the water which then forces those fragments to grind against eachother into sediment and then lays them up as a layer on the inside of the Earth, then the internal pressure starts forming a new layer beneath that pushing the entire continent above a little more outwards, over a short period of time these layers leave the lake/ocean area and go into an intermediate zone where it's just hot and has no water the pressure from above due to the weight of the continents and the pressure and heat from below quickly turn these layers of hod mud into sedimentary rock. These layers today are forming at a rate of 2 to 3 layers per day. Thats right! the Earth is expanding from the inside. And it's not at a rate of 1 layer per year, it's at a rate of 3 layers per day. and the number of layers is not enough to add up to 5 billion. 2.7 miles is more like 675 million years at a rate of 1 layer a year, so at a rate of 3 layers a day 675,000,000 / 365 / 3 = 616,438.356 years. But thats not figuring the implications this has on the Earth's formation. It wasn't always 3 layers a day! and given water being inside the earth, that means water arrived much earlier in the formation of the earth, in fact it was probably there in large amounts on day 1.
The solids of the Earth came together under the heat of the forming sun as a molten globe. Water was added, This water and the coldness of space cooled the atmosphere until the layer of magma at the surface cooled enough to form a thin sheet of rock on the surface, with large amounts of water this process would have been swift. This was the first layer of the earth, now hot magma rises and cooler magma will sink, thats physics. but a sheet of solidified magma wont sink easily, instead it'll float due to surface tension. even still there were likely plumes of magma rising form the core and vortexes of cooler magma sinking back into the core, again thats physics. the locations of these plumes and vortexes created the shapes of the continental plates and the continents on top of them were the solidified sheet of magma. After this with-in 24 hours more than 8000 layers of rock were laid up from the inside and not a single layer laid down from on top. And with that the surface had cooled substantially so that liquid water could pool in the low areas. The rate of layers being laid up would decrease over time based on the weight of the earth's crust in proportion to the internal pressure. But this will eventually find an equalibrium at some small number of layers per day.
This being inherently true, means that it is fact to say the majority of Earth's layers were laid up from the inside, and quickly, Rather than laid down from the outside gradually. We're talking multiple billion layers within the first 10 thousand years!, this would be even faster at the equator. Thats right the heat would be more intense there as is the pressure so it would likely form many times as many layers as at the poles.
more water was added later, it may have been orbiting the earth or floating it's way down through the atmosphere for a few hundred years. but eventually it was added. and in the flood stirred up the outer layers of the earth and redeposited them in layers according to weight and density as the water receeded.
So the Earth is far younger than we think. That means all the fossils in the layers close to the surface were laid down during and after the flood.
thats right this implies Earth has a water cycle. What? you believed rain came down on the mountains and filled all the rivers?, well, thats a lot of rain! it's not actually enough.
I'm sorry thats a small part of the water cycle. Instead there is a liquid water cycle as well as one by rain and condensation and the liquid water cycle supplies most of our fresh water (and explains salt lakes). Inside the earth there are bodies of water beneath the crust. This water is highly pressurized and finds it's way up through cracks into springs, these springs typically come out at the tops of geological formations because of either faultline cracks or volcanic tubes are the way up from beneath. The water then flows out and down the mountain to fill the rivers, the rivers then empty into the ocean and add to the mass and weight of the water in the ocean which then creates more and more pounds of pressure on the water below as you go deeper and deeper, causing the water at the bottom of the ocean to be forced through the rock, it then enters the undercrust oceans or lakes and the cycle begins again. Yeah there are salt lakes beneath the crust and salt water seems to enter those, likely via a volcanic fissure at the bottom of the ocean, where salt water is allowed to enter intot he lakes directly. where fresh water lakes inside the earth's crust are formed by ocean water being forced through stone taking away the salt content and giving us prue drinking water. Some streams where lakes are attached to volcanic regions may well up salt water (it's not in every case, the spring could be hundreds or thousands of miles from the under crust source).
What does this mean about rising ocean levels? well if Climate change were true, which it's not, (we've been over that in another document), and water did not have a cycle like I've illustrated, and just flowed into the ocean endlessly increasing the ocean level); people's water use and melting icebergs and glaciers would be the least of all sources of rising ocean levels. Instead rivers and lakes would be a great majority of all the water pumping into oceans endlessly night and day and it would be mankind's duty to stop a flood by attempting to store as much water as they could to prevent rivers taking it into the oceans. Thankfully rising oceans will NEVER EVER be an issue as the Earth self-regulates it's water level as specified above. The more water in the ocean the heavier the pressure on the water at the bottom, the more pressure on the water at the bottom the faster it is forced through rock into the undercrust oceans. It forms a balance. Unless more water were suddenly added to the Earth, this balancing act will make up for any slight changes in water use or melting ice and we will never see a dramatic rise in the oceans ever, it's impossible!. Like trying to fill up a cup with a large hole in the bottom about the same size as the inflow.
In fact this water cycle would have begun in the first few years of the Earth as the water pooled the pressure would have forced some of it under the crust. This would have supplied the rivers and lakes of the early earth with fresh water. And Consequently started the first sedimentary layers of the earth being layed up from the inside.